Valuable or less valuable, anything goes missing in an average household,
the first and the usual suspect is the housemaid. ‘She must have stolen it’ – this is what most residents of that
household say with utmost confidence. To add more credence to their theory they
also add – ‘I saw her lurking
suspiciously for no reason yesterday. She must be contemplating the same.’
At times the maid is even quizzed or indirectly made to feel that she is the
suspect, much to her embarrassment.
Parallel search for that object continues and one would
agree that 95% of the times that object is found in the house itself, that
someone kept carelessly or too carefully, and then blissfully forgot about the
same.
The missing has been found and everyone is happy in the
house, but the poor maid? Her self-respect has been crushed once more by her
suspecting rich employers. No one feels any need to even say sorry to the poor
soul who stays with the blemish and lives with the stigma ever after that she
was called a thief, when she was innocent.
Ditto happens in many offices and the suspects more often than not are the petty workers.
Ditto happens in many offices and the suspects more often than not are the petty workers.
Does being poor means being less honest?
Do most of us somewhere deep down feel that less privileged
people lack values and cannot be trusted?
Few days back, I encountered an acclaimed academician's piece of advice for his alma mater from where he graduated 5 decades
back. His advice startled me. His alma mater known for being very sophisticated
and traditionally open to kids of the elite, after decades of exclusivity
was opening doors to less privileged students coming from lower economic
strata.
He wrote...
“Traditionally our institution has been known for the kind of values that our students are endowed with. However now that we have decided to open our doors for the less-privileged we have to more careful. These students coming from poor families may not have that kind of access and hence may not have the kind of values that our students generally have. It is philanthropic that we have decided to open our doors for the poor boys and girls but we must do extra diligence to ensure that the values are instilled in them.”
“Traditionally our institution has been known for the kind of values that our students are endowed with. However now that we have decided to open our doors for the less-privileged we have to more careful. These students coming from poor families may not have that kind of access and hence may not have the kind of values that our students generally have. It is philanthropic that we have decided to open our doors for the poor boys and girls but we must do extra diligence to ensure that the values are instilled in them.”
Clearly the assumption is that boys and girls who come from
poor families do not have good values and they need to be educated on the same
as well. This reflects the same mindset?
How far is this true?
Recent disclosures by Swiss authorities show how some India’s
rich industrialists are stashing away millions in foreign banks to evade tax. The size of India’s black money market is
enough to make you feel a bit dizzy. A World Bank report puts India’s shadow
economy at close to one-fifth of economic output. Obviously poor people did not
stash away these millions in foreign banks; and those rich people who did surely
will not score very high on values.
A survey conducted by National Council of Applied Economic
Research (NCAER) shows that an average urban household in India pays around Rs
4,400 annually as bribe, while rural households have to shell out Rs 2,900. How
can people laden with values pay and accept bribes?
All this cannot be the product of high values; and all those
people are not poor.
Government defines BPL (below poverty line) as those whose
average monthly per capita expenditure is not more than Rs. 816/- in rural
areas and Rs. 1000/- in urban areas. That is much lower than the bribe being
paid.
Wait! We must not give rise to another stereotyped perception
here that all rich people lack values. As much as this is not true, can then it
be conclusively decided that those devoid of riches are devoid of values as
well?
No comments:
Post a Comment